ReviewBioactive materials2025
Nanotechnology strategies for endometrium health: Are we on the right track?
Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curcumin Loaded ZIF 8 Nanomaterials Ameliorate Porcine Endometritis Like Lesions in a Mouse Model via Regulating Macrophage Polarization and Antibacterial Activity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Photoacoustic Imaging for Women's Gynecological Health: Advances and Clinical Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Electric field-induced inflammatory and angiogenic responses in rat female reproductive tissues: evidence for early extracellular matrix remodeling.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- Endometriosis as a Systemic and Complex Disease: Toward Phenotype-Based Classification and Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Is Emerging Nanomedicine a Friend or Foe to Germ Cells?International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The endometrium is a vital mucosal tissue which undergoes cyclical regeneration, differentiation, and remodeling upon hormonal, cellular, and molecular signaling networks. Dysregulation of these processes can trigger a range of pathological conditions including chronic inflammatory disorders, hyperplastic lesions, malignancies, and infertility, necessitating the need for effective therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, we are still dependent on conventional treatment modalities which are often constrained by inefficient drug biodistribution, systemic toxicity, and emergence of therapeutic resistance. Recently, nanomedicines have gained tremendous attention in human healthcare, because they not only diagnose the disease but also deliver therapeutic agents to the targeted site without affecting healthy organs. There are numerous nanotechnology-based approaches that have been applied for clinical usage(s). In addition, recent advances in nanoparticle-based photothermal therapy, immunomodulatory approaches, and molecular imaging techniques have demonstrated considerable potential in refining both therapeutic and diagnostic strategies for endometrial pathologies. Herein, we reviewed a comprehensive analysis of nanotechnology-driven innovations in endometrial disease management, elucidating their mechanistic foundations, translational prospects, and future trajectories in endometrium and gynecological nanomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.