ArticleCureus2025
Alterations in Cardiac Function During Hemodynamic Fluctuations in Major Neurosurgery: An Evaluation Using Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaintaining hemodynamic stability during the perioperative period of major neurosurgical procedures is of paramount importance. A major challenge for anesthesiologists during hemodynamic fluctuations is identifying the underlying cause to guide appropriate therapy. Limited literature is available on the utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during hemodynamic fluctuations in major neurosurgery. We prospectively investigated the role of TEE-derived measures of preload, myocardial contractility, and afterload to evaluate the causes of hemodynamic instability during neurosurgery.
methodsSixty-three adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk grades 1 and 2) undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures in Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology (SCTIMST), Thiruvananthapuram, India, were included. An episode of significant hemodynamic instability was defined as a change of ±20% of either heart rate or blood pressure or both from the baseline. During each episode, TEE was used to identify changes in preload, myocardial contractility, and afterload, and these data were used to ascertain the cause of hemodynamic instability. For each of the variables, i.e., heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), a chi-square test was used to assess significant changes in the TEE variables measured between those with significant changes and those without. A p-value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.
resultsA total of 137 episodes of significant changes in heart rate and blood pressure were observed. Bradycardia was associated with improved preload variables. Tachycardia was associated with increased stroke volume variation (SVV), superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI), increased myocardial contractility, increased cardiac output (CO), reduced stroke volume (SV), and increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR). A decrease in SBP was associated with a decrease in preload indices. An increase in SBP showed a significant increase in SVR. A decrease in MAP was associated with preserved SVC-CI, but a significant reduction in CO. An increase in MAP was associated with a significant reduction in SV and an increase in SVR.
conclusionBy integrating TEE measures of preload, afterload, and contractility, we gain better insight into the clinical context, which enables us to respond effectively and target therapy appropriately during the perioperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.