ReviewCureus2025
Long-Term Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery Compared to Modern Medical Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypothesis: Nutrient Off-Loading and Ectopic Fat Reduction Reverse Insulin Resistance and Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Research progress in precision medicine for type 2 diabetes based on the GLP-1.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the comparative effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus medical therapy in managing obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A decade-long literature search from January 2014 to January 2024 identified 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving diverse populations, interventions, and outcomes. The analysis demonstrates that bariatric procedures, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and metabolic surgery, consistently outperform medical interventions, including GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and intensive lifestyle modifications, in achieving superior glycemic control, weight reduction, and metabolic improvement. Surgical interventions also led to favorable outcomes in terms of quality of life, beta-cell function, and renal protection, particularly in high-risk groups such as adolescents and patients with diabetic kidney disease. The risk of bias assessment showed that most trials were of low risk or some concern, lending moderate to high confidence to the conclusions. These findings highlight the potential of metabolic surgery as a transformative strategy for durable diabetes remission in appropriately selected patients, supporting its integration into clinical guidelines alongside pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.