ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Construction of a deep - learning - based rehabilitation prediction model for lower-limb motor dysfunction after stroke using synchronous EEG-EMG and fMRI.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Construct a predictive model for rehabilitation outcomes in ischemic stroke patients 3 months post-stroke using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images, as well as synchronized electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) time series data. Methods: A total of 102 hemiplegic patients with ischemic stroke were recruited. Resting - state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans were carried out on all patients and 86 of them underwent simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) examinations. After data preprocessing, we established prediction models based on time-series data and fMRI images separately. The predictions of the time - series model and the fMRI model were integrated using ensemble learning methods to create a multimodal fusion prediction model. The accuracy, recall, precision, F1 - score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. Results: Compared to unimodal prediction models, multimodal fusion models demonstrated superior predictive performance. The ShuffleNet-LSTM model outperformed other multimodal fusion approaches. The area under the ROC curve was 0.8665, accuracy was 0.8031, F1-score was 0.7829, recall was 0.774, and precision was 0.833. Conclusion: A deep learning-based rehabilitation prediction model utilizing multimodal signals was successfully developed. The ShuffleNet-LSTM model exhibited excellent performance among multimodal fusion models, effectively enhancing the accuracy of predicting lower-limb motor function recovery in stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.