ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Effect of adding
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated network pharmacology and in vivo validation reveal the action of Scutellaria baicalensis extract against oviductal inflammation in laying hens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Dietary baicalin supplementation enhances growth performance in fattening Hu sheep via dual modulation of immunity and gastrointestinal microbiome-metabolic crosstalk.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inflammation and oxidative stress can seriously endanger the health and growth of beef cattle. Methods: In total, 20 cattles (Simmental xlocal yellow cattle) were randomly divided into four groups: CON, G1, G2, and G3 (with 3%, 6%, and 9% SB stems and leaves added to the roughage, respectively). All cattles were exposed to pre-experimental conditions for 15 days and experimental conditions for 90 days. Growth performance indicators were measured on the 0th, 15th, 45th, and 90th days of the formal experiment. Blood was collected for measuring biochemical performance indices. Fresh fecal samples were collected on the 90th day for 16S sequencing to study the microbial diversity of cow feces. Results: The results showed that during the experiment, the F/G of the G1, G2, and G3 groups was significantly lower than that of the CON group ( Discussion: Our findings revealed that adding the stems and leaves of SB to feed can promote body growth and antioxidant capacity and increase the diversity of the gut microbiota. This new feeding strategy can improve the efficiency of cattle farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.