Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919375›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025

Biomimetic nanocarriers for the therapy and management of intestinal inflammations.

Rupam Bera, Shivam Pathak, Pradhi Srivastava, Maitrayee Ghosh, Anjana Sharma, Noor Zaheer Ahmed, Ritu Karwasra, Usama Akram, Pawan Kumar, Bhupesh Sharma and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rupam BeraDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201313, India.
Shivam PathakDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201313, India.
Pradhi SrivastavaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201313, India.
Maitrayee GhoshDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201313, India.
Anjana SharmaLloyd Institute of Management and Technology, Plot No. 11, Knowledge Park-II, Greater Noida 201306, India.
Noor Zaheer AhmedCentral Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), Ministry of Ayush Govt of India, New Delhi, India.
Ritu KarwasraCentral Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), Ministry of Ayush Govt of India, New Delhi, India.
Usama AkramCentral Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), Ministry of Ayush Govt of India, New Delhi, India.
Pawan KumarCentral Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), Ministry of Ayush Govt of India, New Delhi, India.
Bhupesh SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life, Sciences, Gurugram University (A State Govt. University), Gurugram, Haryana 122003, India.
Nitin SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201313, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal inflammation particularly inflammatory bowel disease poses significant clinical challenges due to its chronic nature, limited treatment efficacy and adverse effects of conventional therapies like corticosteroids and biologics. Biomimetic nanocarriers have emerged as a transformative strategy to overcome these limitations by leveraging natural cell membranes for targeted drug delivery. This review critically examines the application of biomimetic nanocarriers as precision therapeutics for intestinal inflammation. We discuss key fabrication techniques including extrusion, sonication and microfluidics used to coat synthetic nanocarriers with membranes derived from several biological sources such as macrophages, neutrophils, platelets, stem cells and bacteria. These biomimetic coatings exploit inherent biological functions such as immune evasion, receptor-mediated binding to inflamed endothelium and responsiveness to inflammatory stimuli. Preclinical studies demonstrate that biomimetic nanocarriers effectively suppress pro-inflammatory pathways like NF-κB, NLRP3, sequester cytokines, promote mucosal healing and restore gut microbiota balance while minimizing systemic toxicity. Despite promising outcomes in animal models, clinical translation faces hurdles in membrane isolation standardization, long-term biosafety, and regulatory alignment. Future advancements require interdisciplinary efforts to optimize pharmacokinetics, enhance tissue-specific targeting, and integrate personalized designs. Biomimetic nanocarriers represent a paradigm shift toward disease-modifying therapies, offering potential for sustained remission in intestinal inflammation management.

Indexed as

BiomimeticInflammatory bowel diseaseNanocarrierNanomedicineTargeted deliveryUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40919375
PMCPMC12410523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.