ArticleResuscitation plus2025
The quality of CPR delivered by EMS personnel wearing enhanced personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study from Perth, Australia.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To measure the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel wearing 'enhanced' personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Perth, Australia. Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic, non-EMS-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) with resuscitation attempted by St John (Ambulance) Western Australia (SJWA) between 16/03/2020-16/05/2021; corresponding to the first 14 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We reported the median (interquartile range [IQR]) compression depth, rate and fraction across the cohort, along with the proportion of cases compliant with resuscitation guidelines issued by the Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation (ANZCOR). We also looked for evidence of rescuer fatigue by comparing CPR quality during the first 10 min of resuscitation to the remaining CPR effort. Results: Of 659 adult, non-traumatic, non-EMS-witnessed OHCA with SJWA-attempted resuscitation, 467 cases (71 %) had usable CPR quality data. The median (IQR) compression depth was 5.9 (5.4, 6.5) cm; with 89.5 % of cases having an average depth ≥5 cm as stipulated by ANZCOR guidelines. The median (IQR) compression rate was 108 (106, 110) min Conclusion: EMS personnel in Perth delivered high quality CPR, without evidence of fatigue, despite wearing enhanced PPE during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.