Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919670›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends.

Mohammad Moghaddasi, Busra Oktay, Ayse Betul Bingol, Reyhan Yanikoglu, Meryem Muslu, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Cem Bulent Ustundag

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad MoghaddasiDepartment of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey.
Busra OktayDepartment of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey.
Ayse Betul BingolDepartment of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey.
Reyhan YanikogluDepartment of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey.
Meryem MusluDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34210, Turkey.
Ibrahim T OzbolatEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Cem Bulent UstundagDepartment of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-0878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conductive nanocomposite hydrogels (CNHs) represent a promising tool in neural tissue engineering, offering tailored electroactive microenvironments to address the complex challenges of neural repair. This systematic scoping review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, synthesizes recent advancements in CNH design, functionality, and therapeutic efficacy for central and peripheral nervous system (CNS and PNS) applications. The analysis of 125 studies reveals a growing emphasis on multifunctional materials, with carbon-based nanomaterials (CNTs, graphene derivatives; 36.8%), metals (Iron oxides, gold, etc.; 24.0%), conductive polymers (PEDOT, PPy, etc.; 16.0%), and hybrid systems dominating due to their synergistic electrical, mechanical, and bioactive properties. For CNS repair, spinal cord injury models (n  =  42) leverage antioxidant-conductive hybrids and immunomodulatory systems to mitigate oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. For PNS repair-particularly sciatic nerve regeneration (n  =  20)-CNHs demonstrate efficacy through stimuli-responsive strategies (including wireless and self-powered piezoelectric and magnetic systems) and biomimetic scaffold design to guide axonal regeneration. Tailored hydrogel designs also address traumatic brain injury, stroke, and Parkinson's disease. Beyond these, CNHs show promise in diverse neural tissue engineering contexts, including neurovascular niche reconstruction for diabetic wound healing, coordinated neurogenic and osteogenic differentiation in bone and muscle repair, and auditory neurogenesis in cochlear applications. This review highlights the potential of CNHs by elucidating recent applications across various neural tissue engineering contexts.

Indexed as

HydrogelsNanocompositesTissue EngineeringAnimalsElectric ConductivityHumansNerve RegenerationHydrogelsconductive hydrogelnanocompositenanomaterialneural differentiationneural tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40919670
PMCPMC12520499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.