Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919706›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Decay stages of Jurassic wood debris from Scotland: evidence for the coevolution of fungal rot, arthropods and the nurse log strategy.

Ana Julia Sagasti, Sophie Burne, Jeremy Wyman, Alexander J Hetherington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Julia SagastiInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-0591
Sophie BurneInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9487-7837
Jeremy WymanInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6552-6614
Alexander J HetheringtonInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-818X

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Y037138/1Human Frontiers Science Program RGP012/2023Leverhulme Trust PLP-2023-324UK Research and Innovation MR/T018585/1UK Research and Innovation MR/Y03399X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key feature of extant conifer forests is the high percentage of seeds that germinate and establish on dead wood; in some forests, this can exceed 90%. This deadwood can act as an ideal nursery for young tree species, leading to this type of seedbed being termed 'nurse logs'. It is unclear how common this ecological strategy has been throughout the evolutionary history of conifers. Here, we describe a c. 150-million-year-old wood fragment from the Jurassic of Scotland using classic palaeobotanical techniques and microscopy. We interpret our new finding within the evolution of gymnosperms with a literature review of fossil nurse logs, and fungal and arthropod evolution. We interpret the timeline of decay processes on this log as consisting of three main stages: breakdown of the wood by white pocket rot; two types of arthropod boring, likely by beetles and mites; and colonisation by small roots. These findings demonstrate the complexity of decay processes occurring on a Jurassic forest floor, and the key role that white rot and arthropods play in the nurse log ecological strategy. Conifer germination on nurse logs facilitated by white rot fungi is a conserved ecological strategy of relevance in shaping forest ecosystems over geological timescales.

Indexed as

ArthropodsBiological EvolutionWoodAnimalsFossilsScotlandconifersfossil fungifungal decaypalaeobotanyplant–arthropod interactionsplant evolutionplant–plant interactionsroots

Identifiers

PMID40919706
PMCPMC12489302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.