Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40920380›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Social Participation and Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults.

Yuta Takemura, Kosuke Inoue, Koryu Sato, Maho Haseda, Koichiro Shiba, Naoki Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuta TakemuraTokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Kosuke InoueDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Koryu SatoDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Maho HasedaDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichiro ShibaDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Naoki KondoDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous studies have suggested that social participation helps prevent depression among older adults. However, evidence is lacking about whether the preventive benefits vary among individuals and who would benefit most. Objective: To examine the sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related heterogeneity in the association between social participation and depressive symptoms among older adults and to identify the individual characteristics among older adults expected to benefit the most from social participation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants aged 65 years or older in the 2016, 2019, and 2022 waves of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES), a nationwide survey examining social determinants of health and social environment in Japan. All participants were functionally and cognitively independent. Analyses were performed from February 2024 to February 2025. Exposures: Social participation recorded in the 2019 JAGES. Participation included involvement in hobby groups, sports groups or clubs, volunteer clubs, senior citizen clubs, and neighborhood communities more often than once a month. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was depressive symptoms defined as a score of 5 or higher on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; score range: 0-15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms) in the 2022 JAGES. After 1:1 propensity score matching on the status of social participation in the 2019 JAGES to adjust for characteristics in the 2016 JAGES, a machine learning-based causal forest algorithm was used to assess the heterogeneity in the association between social participation and depressive symptoms. Conditional average treatment effect (CATE) was estimated for each individual, and the median of the CATE distribution was used as a threshold to categorize participants by their characteristics into the high-benefit group or low-benefit group. Results: Among the 11 146 propensity score-matched older individuals (mean [SD] age, 72.40 (5.15) years; 5762 men [51.7%]; 15.7% developed depressive symptoms), social participation was associated with reduction in the risk of depressive symptoms (2.2 [95% CI, 0.9-3.5] percentage points). The causal forest model showed heterogeneity across individual characteristics. Compared with the low-benefit group, the high-benefit group were more likely to be older and have lower socioeconomic status (lower educational level and household income). The reduction in risk of depressive symptoms associated with social participation was observed in the high-benefit group (4.1 [95% CI, 1.3-6.9] percentage points) but not in the low-benefit group (0.4 [95% CI, -2.0 to 2.8] percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the association between social participation and depressive symptoms varied across individual characteristics. Promoting social participation, particularly for older adults with lower socioeconomic status, would play a role in not only improved mental health but also decreased mental health disparities during the global population aging.

Indexed as

DepressionSocial ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMale

Identifiers

PMID40920380
PMCPMC12418130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.