ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2025
Impact of Confounding Factors in Human Postmortem Brain Tissues on Gene Expression Profiles: A Comparison of Patients With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Nonpsychiatric Controls.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-Derived Cellular Models in Psychiatry: A Focus on the Olfactory Neuroepithelium.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Genetic risk for neurodevelopmental disorders as a potential factor affecting antipsychotic responsiveness in schizophrenia: a postmortem brain study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Impact of Confounding Factors in Human Postmortem Brain Tissues on Gene Expression Profiles: A Comparison of Patients With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Nonpsychiatric Controls.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Controlling for confounding factors in postmortem brain studies of psychiatric disorders is crucial, particularly in gene expression analyses. Potential confounding factors include sex, age at death, medication history, agonal state, postmortem interval (PMI), tissue storage duration, tissue pH, and RNA integrity number (RIN). pH and RIN are considered particularly important in gene expression analysis because they accurately reflect mRNA quality. We previously found that pH and RIN affected the levels of genes related to the cell cycle and RNA processing, respectively, and both affected genes involved in energy production and the immune system. In this study, we investigated the influence of confounding factors on gene expression profiles in psychiatric disorders. We measured gene expression levels in the prefrontal cortex of 25 deceased patients with schizophrenia, 10 with bipolar disorder, and 21 nonpsychiatric controls via RNA sequencing, and identified genes associated with pH, RIN, PMI, sex, age at death, tissue storage duration, and antipsychotic drug dose. We identified key molecular pathways through Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. The total number of mRNA variants significantly correlated with gene expression, and each confounding factor was as follows: 139 for sex, 87 for age, 99 for PMI, 35 386 for pH, 11 373 for RIN, and 13 414 for storage duration. We identified strong associations with metabolic, immune, energy production, and DNA repair pathways. The expression of certain genes was strongly associated with different confounding factors; therefore, it is necessary to consider these factors when interpreting the gene expression profile in brain tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.