ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Development and Implementation of an Ambulatory Orders-Based Ophthalmology Imaging Workflow.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOcular imaging is essential to the diagnosis and management of eye disease, yet standardized imaging workflows remain underdeveloped in the eye care setting. This manuscript describes the design and implementation of an orders-based imaging workflow for ambulatory ophthalmology integrated with the electronic health record and enterprise imaging systems.
methodsWe developed a DICOM-compliant workflow for pediatric ophthalmology imaging that supports HL7 integration, DICOM modality worklists, and enterprise archive storage. Workflow steps were automated where possible, including imaging order placement, metadata application, and documentation. Pre- and post-implementation workflows were evaluated for efficiency, measuring mouse clicks, keystrokes, and time to completion. Imaging study volumes and billing data were collected following implementation.
resultsThirteen imaging devices across six modalities and five locations were integrated. The new workflow reduced manual data entry and enabled structured documentation. Post-implementation, 16,267 imaging studies were completed, generating $11.4 million in billed charges. Workflow efficiency improved, with keystrokes and mouse clicks reduced by 40-86% depending on modality. Time savings were observed in most modalities, although optical coherence tomography and B-scan ultrasound required more time due to order-specific imaging steps.
conclusionAn orders-based imaging workflow for ophthalmology can improve efficiency, standardization, and interoperability while enabling proper image archiving and billing. Challenges remain with vendor variability in DICOM support and image output formats. These findings support broader adoption of standardized imaging practices in ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.