Trial reportGeroScience2026
The proBNPage reduction (PBAR) trial-results of a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study to fine tune an NT-proBNP-based method to assess the effect of anti-aging treatments.
Trial report in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NT-proBNP levels increase exponentially with age and are associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. From NT-proBNP concentration a surrogate for biological age ("proBNPage") can be obtained. The primary objective of this study was to define a method to design future trials on anti-aging treatments using proBNPage. The secondary objective was the tentative evaluation of 4 potential anti-aging dietary supplements. The trial lasted 2 years and involved 120 healthy subjects aged 71.7 ± 4.6 years divided into 3 groups: A) coenzyme Q10 100 mg bid + selenium 100 mcg, B) resveratrol 350 mg bid + TA-65 100U, C) placebo. ProBNPage was the primary outcome variable. Secondary variables included step test duration, handgrip strength, and self-reported health status. In group B, the study was interrupted at month 5 due to significant LDL-cholesterol increase, probably caused by the high-dose resveratrol. Partly because of dropouts and inadequate treatment intake, groups A and C showed non-significant differences in the primary and secondary variables. Therefore, these groups were considered a single group, in which after 2 years proBNPage increased by 2.5 years (P = 0.01), particularly in subjects over 70 (+ 3.0 years, P = 0.009). It was thus calculated that 126 subjects over 70 could allow the assessment of a 2-year treatment vs. placebo with a power of 80%. This study has developed an NT-proBNP-based method to evaluate future interventions on biological age. The treatments did not induce significant changes in proBNPage. The marked increase in cholesterol in group B suggests that high-dose resveratrol should be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.