ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Gene Expression Associated With Behaviour Manipulation in Wood Ants Infected With Larval Lancet Fluke, Dicrocoelium dendriticum.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ant brain metabolomics reveals contrasting purine and amine dynamics in a reversible trematode-induced host manipulation.Royal Society open science · 2026Article
- Blade-running: an efficient yet simple behaviour to potentially combat summit disease in ants.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many ant species show dramatic shifts in behaviour when infected with parasites, but the molecular basis of these behavioural changes is not well understood. An example is the wood ant, Formica aserva, which serves as an intermediate host for the lancet liver fluke, Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Infected ants leave their nests during the cool hours of the day, ascend a flower and then attach themselves to a petal with their mandibles. Attached ants remain affixed to an inflorescence overnight, after which they detach, descend the plant and return to their nest. Unless eaten by a grazing mammal (the obligate next host), infected ants repeat this attach-and-detach cycle for the rest of the summer. We used transcriptomics to decipher the potential molecular mechanisms that underlie this reversible behaviour manipulation. Using naturally infected ants, we recreated the manipulation cycle in the laboratory and then evaluated messenger RNA from ant brains at four contrasting phases of manipulation. Among these phases, we found a total of 1349 transcripts differentially expressed between infected and uninfected ant brains. Many of these transcripts are involved in cell signalling pathways, including odorant, gustatory, vision, circadian rhythm and the production of biogenic monoamines and hormones. Metabolism, protein management and DNA repair functions might also play a role at different phases of manipulation. Our combined results are consistent with the idea that the mechanism(s) leading to the attach/detach/repeat sequence of behaviours of fluke-infected ants is multifaceted, involving much more than temperature-dependent contraction/relaxation of the mandibular muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.