ReviewJAACAP open2025
A Systematic Review: Investigating Biomarkers of Anhedonia and Amotivation in Depression and Cannabis Use.
Review in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered reward-related resting-state network properties in adolescent cannabis use and depression.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess biological factors associated with anhedonia in depression and amotivation in cannabis use (PROSPERO: CRD42023422438). Method: A systematic review was conducted of 8 electronic databases. Inclusion criteria included original research studies that investigated the association of biological factors or behavioral tasks with depression combined with concepts of anhedonia or cannabis combined with concepts of amotivation including apathy. Results: The review included 44 articles that evaluated biological factors associated with anhedonia in depression and 2 articles that evaluated biological factors associated with amotivation in cannabis use. Overall, anhedonia was operationalized as loss of anticipatory pleasure or consummatory pleasure using a range of measures. No biological factor or behavioral task was consistently associated with anhedonia in depression. Neuroimaging studies encompassed heterogeneous study designs and analytic approaches, with little overlap among findings of brain regions associated with anhedonia. Regions of interest most frequently associated with anhedonia across functional and structural neuroimaging and tasked-based neuroimaging studies included the anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, and medial prefrontal cortex. No biochemical marker, including interleukin-6 or C-reactive protein, was consistently associated with anhedonia, and most tested associations between biochemical markers and anhedonia were not significant. Conclusion: Heterogeneous study designs and self-reported assessments of anhedonia have yielded variable findings across the literature. Neuroimaging studies of adolescents with depression and cannabis use reveal similar neurobiological deficits in reward processing. Prospectively examining these deficits may inform developmental pathways that underlie the etiology of these disorders and identify novel treatment targets. Study preregistration information: A systematic review of anhedonia and amotivation in depression and cannabis use; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023422438. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.