ArticleCureus2025
Treatment Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Seven Years After the Introduction of Sacrocolpopexy at a Single Institution.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects up to 30% of women during their lifetime and significantly impairs quality of life. In Japan, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was covered by national insurance starting in 2014 and has become an established treatment option. Objective This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of POP surgery, including recurrence and complications, seven years after the introduction of sacrocolpopexy at our institution. Methods Our institution introduced sacrocolpopexy in 2016, while continuing to perform conventional vaginal surgery. Sacrocolpopexy was primarily offered to patients under 80 years of age without diabetes; for other patients, vaginal surgery was generally chosen. Among vaginal surgeries, patients with a favorable general condition underwent native tissue repair (NTR). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy or NTR between April 2016 and June 2023. Results During the period, 90 patients underwent POP surgery, with 37 undergoing sacrocolpopexy and 38 receiving NTR; these 75 cases were included in the analysis. In the sacrocolpopexy group, the median time from symptom onset to surgery was 24 months, and 22 patients had used a pessary preoperatively. The median operative time for sacrocolpopexy was 196 minutes, with minimal bleeding and no intraoperative complications. Postoperative adverse events after sacrocolpopexy included one case each of delirium and acute cholecystitis. Recurrence of stage II or higher POP was observed in three patients in the sacrocolpopexy group; two of these had preoperative stage IV disease and had waited 60 months from symptom onset to surgery. In the NTR group, the median time to surgery was 42 months, and 32 patients had used a pessary preoperatively. The median operative time for NTR was 89 minutes, with minimal bleeding and no intraoperative complications. One postoperative complication (vaginal cuff hematoma) was observed after NTR. Recurrence of POP stage II or higher occurred in three NTR patients, all of whom were stage III or higher preoperatively. Conclusion Sacrocolpopexy and NTR are effective surgical options for POP, particularly in patients who do not respond to conservative management. Although sacrocolpopexy and NTR had a low complication and recurrence rate, it is important to bear in mind that recurrence is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.