ArticleBMJ public health2025
Machine-learning-based model for analysing and accurately predicting factors related to burnout in healthcare workers.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical and emotional health among nurses in protracted crisis settings in Lebanon and Jordan: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning analysis of the association between psychosocial risks and burnout syndrome in mining workers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to analyse the factors affecting medical burnout in hospitals, identify the characteristics of staff experiencing high levels of burnout and devise a practical and sustainable prediction mechanism. Methods: A survey was conducted to access the current situation, followed by a regression analysis using data from the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey, demographic information related to healthcare personnel and employee job satisfaction metrics from the hospitals under study. Subsequently, four predictive models-logistic regression, K-nearest neighbour, decision tree and random forest (RF)-were employed to predict the degree of healthcare burnout. Results: The investigation revealed that 61.2% of the medical staff in the hospitals under study exhibited at least one symptom of burnout, with 9.8% experiencing high levels of burnout. Elevated rates of high burnout were observed in the 30-39 age group, among physicians and surgeons, and among those with 0-5 years of experience. In terms of predictive methods, the RF model demonstrated suitability for predicting burnout among medical staff, achieving a prediction accuracy of approximately 80%. Conclusions: A significant correlation was found between job satisfaction and burnout levels. Physicians and surgeons with less than a decade of professional experience are more prone to high levels of burnout. The RF model proved effective for predicting the burnout level among medical staff, consistently achieving an accuracy rate close to 80%. These findings can serve as valuable insights for hospital administrators in their effort to prevent and mitigate burnout among medical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.