ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025
What Makes Lupins Less Palatable to Consumers? Can the Sensory Quality of Lupin be Improved and Commercialized?
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Composition, Biological Activities and Application ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- What Makes Lupins Less Palatable to Consumers? Can the Sensory Quality of Lupin be Improved and Commercialized?Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introducing underutilized legumes as plant-based protein sources to daily meals is an approach to address the increasing demand for alternative proteins. However, legumes often exhibit off-flavors and aromas, causing negative consumer perceptions. Lupins are an underutilized legume that is becoming popular as a plant protein source due to their high protein, fiber, and low starch contents. Off-flavor and off-aroma from what is believed to be lipoxygenase (LOX) activity make lupin-based food products less palatable. To introduce lupins as a food ingredient into mainstream products, its undesirable sensory traits, such as "beany," "green," and "grassy" flavors, need to be eliminated or reduced to levels that consumers cannot detect. This review discusses the compounds responsible for off-flavors, detection methods, current strategies to eliminate their formation and the possibility of developing lupin-based food products. Previous research has demonstrated the feasibility of developing different lupin-based food products such as fermented beverages, chapattis, bread, muffins, breakfast cereal, snacks, sausage, chips, ice creams, and flavored edible oils. Research attempts have also focused on the impact of different flavor modification treatments such as germination, fermentation, and different heat treatments to mask off-flavors. Of these, fermentation has the potential to reduce off-flavors to some extent, but not to a level where they are not completely detectable by consumers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of off-flavor issues in lupins, specifically Lupinus angustifolius L., offering insights to support the development of advanced off-flavor mitigation strategies for the effective use of lupin ingredients such as flour, protein isolates, concentrates, and flakes in industrial food applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.