ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2025
Impact of lifestyle and environmental factors on fertility.
Review in Current opinion in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antioxidant Capacity of Seminal Plasma and Its Association with Semen Quality and Dietary Antioxidant Intake.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The Global Decline in Sperm Count and Testosterone Levels: Trends, Mechanisms, and Environmental Drivers.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Garment fit, scrotal thermoregulation, and male fertility outcomes: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Integrating Sperm Microscopy, Environmental Exposures, and Lifestyle Factors for Male Fertility Analysis: Protocol for the Nippon Semen and Environmental Exposure Database (N-SEED) Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Overloaded mitochondrial stress drives reproductive damage in GC-1 mouse spermatogonia cells exposed to nickel nanoparticle.Cell biology and toxicology · 2026Article
- Psychological Stress and Male Infertility: Oxidative Stress as the Common Downstream Pathway.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewInfertility affects approximately 15% of couples, with male factors implicated in more than 50% of cases. Concerns over declining semen quality - evidenced by a more than 50% drop in sperm concentration over four decades - have triggered investigation into modifiable lifestyle and environmental factors. This review summarizes recent evidence on exposures that negatively impact male fertility. RECENT
findingsSmoking increases sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) by approximately 10% and alters hormonal profiles; e-cigarettes may carry similar risks. Chronic alcohol use raises SDF by a comparable magnitude, disrupts the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, and may cause testicular atrophy. Obesity impairs spermatogenesis through aromatase-mediated hormonal imbalance and inflammation; and even modest weight loss improves sperm parameters. Drug use - particularly steroids, cannabis, and opioids - may also suppress fertility. Environmental exposures such as heat waves, fine particulate matter, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals reduce semen quality and can contribute to testicular dysgenesis. Conversely, adherence to certain diets, antioxidant supplementation modestly improves sperm quality and reduce SDF. SUMMARY: Lifestyle and environmental factors significantly impair male reproductive health through hormonal disruption, oxidative stress, and direct germ cell damage. These risks are common and often reversible. Identifying and modifying such exposures is essential for improving fertility outcomes and reducing long-term health burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.