ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Accurate detection of tandem repeats exposes ubiquitous reuse of biological sequences.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amino acid homorepeats in tape measure proteins correlate with bacteriophage tail length.The Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- pLM-Repeat: Exploiting the sequence representations of protein language models for sensitive repeat detection.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Emergence and Tandem Repeat-Mediated Elongation of a Translated De Novo Open Reading Frame in Human Oncogenic RNA Gene VPS9D1-AS1 (MYU).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification, structural characterization and gene expression analysis of the LEA_2 gene family in faba bean (Vicia Faba L.).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tandem repetition is one of the major processes underlying genome evolution and phenotypic diversification. While newly formed tandem repeats are often easy to identify, it is more challenging to detect repeat copies as they diverge over evolutionary timescales. Existing programs for finding tandem repeats return markedly different results, and it is unclear which predictions are more correct and how much room remains for improvement. Here, we introduce DetectRepeats, a new method that uses empirical information about structural repeats to improve the accuracy of repeat detection. We show that DetectRepeats advances the state-of-the-art by finding highly divergent repeats with relatively few false positive detections. We apply DetectRepeats to genomes across the tree of life to discover an enrichment of detectable tandem repeats within different genes, genome regions, and taxa. Furthermore, we use phylogenetic reconciliation to determine that some tandem repeats continue to evolve through intra-repeat unit replacement. In this manner, tandem repeats serve as a renewable genetic resource offering a bountiful source of alternative genetic material. Our work unlocks the confident detection of ancient tandem repeats, opening a doorway to future discoveries. DetectRepeats is part of the DECIPHER package for the R programming language and available via Bioconductor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.