ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2026
In Silico Identification of Natural SIRT1 Inhibitors through Molecular Docking, Dynamics Simulation, and MM/PBSA.
Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the huntingtin (HTT) gene, leading to transcriptional dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuronal loss. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT 1), a NAD+-dependent deacetylase, can be neuroprotective in gene expression. Selective SIRT1 inhibition may restore transcriptional balance, making it a potential therapeutic strategy. To identify natural product-derived SIRT1 inhibitors with potential therapeutic relevance for HD. Selisistat (EX-527), a selective SIRT1 inhibitor, was used as a reference to retrieve 1401 structurally similar compounds (Tanimoto similarity ≥68%) from the LOTUS natural products database. Drug-likeness and ADMET properties were evaluated, followed by molecular docking against the catalytic domain of SIRT1 (PDB ID: 4I5I). Top hits underwent 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in GROMACS 2023.3, and binding free estimation via MM/PBSA. Three compounds, LTS0217483, LTS0173725, and LTS0193492, showed higher binding affinities than Selisistat. LTS0217483 had the most favourable total binding energy (-183.52 kJ/mol) and maintained stable interactions with key catalytic residues. Hydrogen bond persistence analysis demonstrated consistent ligand-protein contacts. An integrated computational approach identified LTS0217483 as a promising natural SIRT1 inhibitor for potential HD treatment. Future work will focus on compound optimisation, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling, and experimental validation in cellular and animal HD models. A computerised drug discovery system has identified potential SIRT1 inhibitors that can treat Huntington’s disease. The Tanimoto was used to search for the similarity of 276,518 natural products from the LOTUS database in the presence of Selisistat as a reference, and 1401 compounds were retrieved. An in-silico method to predict AMDET properties was used, and the molecules that satisfied Lipinski’s rule were found to be the lead set. These were also excluded from the BBB permeability, Brenk, and PAINS filters. Subsequently, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed, and MM/PBSA binding free energy calculations were conducted to validate the thermodynamic stability of the protein-ligand complexes. The compound LTS0217483 was chosen because it has the best potential inhibitor, as it has a good binding capability and a more stable configuration that could be a future drug target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40924381What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.