ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Impact of hand function impairment on daily life of patients with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMany patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) experience impaired hand function, yet the precise nature and impact of this impairment remains unclear. In this study, we explored the determinants of hand function impairment in SSc from a patient perspective and its impact on daily life. Additionally, we identified unmet care needs related to hand function impairment.
methodsAdult patients with SSc were included from the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands, and Royal Free Hospital London, United Kingdom (UK). Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was performed to identify key themes. Hand function was evaluated using the modified Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (mHAMIS) and the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS).
resultsThirty-three patients were included (n = 18 in the Netherlands, n = 15 in the UK). Three main themes were identified: symptoms, impact and (un)met needs. The symptoms theme captures the broad range of medical and functional complaints, often co-occurring and leading to significant hand function impairment. The impact theme describes how these symptoms limited daily activities, employment and leisure, and contributed to emotional distress and social isolation. The (un)met needs theme highlights varied coping strategies and experiences with care. While participants felt that patient education was sufficient when healthcare professionals addressed hand impairment, many reported a lack of tailored support and insufficient recognition of hand-related problems.
conclusionHand function impairment in SSc profoundly affects patients' daily lives and well-being. Addressing this unmet need requires greater clinical awareness and more personalised and symptom-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.