ArticlePloS one2025
The SURVIVE study (NCT05658172): Bringing breast cancer aftercare to the 21stcentury: Study protocol of a Phase III clinical trial comparing liquid biopsy guided vs. Standard of care surveillance for intermediate to high-risk breast cancer survivors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent aftercare in breast cancer survivors aims to detect local recurrences or contralateral disease, while the detection of distant metastases has not been a central focus due to a lack of evidence supporting an effect on overall survival. However, the data underpinning these guidelines are mainly from trials of the 1980s/1990s and have not been updated to reflect the significant advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic options that have emerged over the past 40 years. In this trial, the aim is to test whether a liquid biopsy-based detection of (oligo-) metastatic disease at an early pre-symptomatic stage followed by timely treatment can impact overall survival compared to current standard aftercare.
methodsIn this partially double-blinded superiority study, intensified liquid biopsy-guided surveillance will be assessed versus standard surveillance in medium-to-high-risk early breast cancer patients. Intensive surveillance comprises 3-monthly tests of circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC) and serum tumor markers CEA, CA 27.29 and CA125. Upon positivity of biomarker and/or symptoms, staging examinations are initiated. In total, 3500 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after completion of primary antineoplastic therapy. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and the overall lead time effect. The trial will be accompanied by an extensive translational research program. DISCUSSION: A risk-based aftercare and regular screening for asymptomatic metastatic disease with molecular markers in the absence of any radiological findings can potentially revolutionize current follow-up care of breast cancer survivors and enable potential treatment even before patients suffer from symptomatic, incurable disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.