ArticleInternational psychogeriatrics2026
Barriers and facilitators to usability of a smartphone-based digital mental health tool in older adults: Insights from a secondary analysis of mindLAMP.
Article in International psychogeriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Smartphone Monitoring Assessments as a Cognitive Biomarker of Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for a Development Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Impacts of an app-assisted comprehensive oral frailty prevention program on oral frailty and care dependency risk in community-dwelling older adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- National implementation of a digital Parkinson's disease screening programme in Thailand: reach, adoption, and real-world performance of the CheckPD app.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Integrating Data Visualizations Into Digital Mental Health Care for Adults With Anxiety and Depression: Participatory Design and Case Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring Chinese older adults' acceptance of digital mental health interventions: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Designing digital mental health interventions for older adults: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- LINC: a framework for maintaining high-quality passive data in digital phenotyping studies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Older adults' views of passive smartphone monitoring for dementia risk: a multi-method analysis.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs demand for mental healthcare access grows among older adult populations, digital mental health tools have emerged as promising tools. However, bridging the digital divide among older technology users remains critical. This post-hoc analysis evaluated potential factors influencing the adoption of a digital mental health tool in older adults.
methodsWe analyzed data from 37 older adults who used a digital phenotyping app (mindLAMP) for 4 weeks to capture passive sensor data and complete nightly surveys. We examined associations between baseline participant features including demographics, cognition, mood, technology attitudes and use, and usability outcomes including app training metrics, adherence, and self-reported usability.
resultsParticipants had a mean age of 72, with most identifying as female (68 %), college educated (76 %), retired (81 %), and White (59 %). The app demonstrated high usability, with baseline training averaging 20.2 (±6.5) minutes and 80 % nightly survey completion. At study completion, 30/37 participants reported finding the app easy to use. While not significant after correction, female sex, Black race, and some college education emerged as potentially promising factors associated with better usability outcomes. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that with modest training, older adults can engage with digital health tools and report positive usability experiences. Differences in usability outcomes by sex, race, and education point to potential characteristics that may influence engagement. However, given the small, highly educated sample, these findings should be replicated in larger, more diverse cohorts to better understand which factors support the successful use of digital health tools in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.