Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926145›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Occupational physical demands in eldercare workers: a systematic scoping review of studies reporting quantitative data.

Nestor Lögdal, Jennie A Jackson, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Sven Svensson, David M Hallman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nestor LögdalDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Gävle, Sweden. nestor.logdal@hig.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-5294
Jennie A JacksonDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-0236
Svend Erik MathiassenDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1443-6211
Sven SvenssonDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-1981
David M HallmanDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-1868

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 019-01257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo summarize the literature on quantitative measures of physical demands in eldercare, with attention to differences between temporary and permanent workers, and to identify gaps to guide future physiological research.

methodsWe searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for English and Swedish peer-reviewed studies on physical demands in eldercare. Risk of bias was assessed, and descriptive data extracted.

resultsWe identified 37 relevant articles where physical demands were assessed via self-report (n = 23), biomechanical modeling (n = 6), and direct measurement (n = 8). Risk of bias assessment showed generally insufficient descriptions of study settings and poor descriptions of instruments assessing physical demands. Workers reported physical demands ranging from 40 to 98% maximum (different scales across studies). Biomechanical models showed peak forces in the lower back up to 5092 N during lifts and transfers. Direct measurements indicated that workers spent half to two-thirds of the day on feet, had oxygen uptakes 0.59-0.63 L/min, and mean heart rates 89-107 bpm across the workday. No study provided estimates specifically for temporary workers.

conclusionResults suggested that eldercare work is perceived as demanding by the workers, who spend considerable time on feet, and that it comprises tasks with high spinal loads, but shows low cardiovascular demands. These findings offer a foundation for future studies exploring the short- and long-term physiological implications of occupational exposure in eldercare, including the effect of targeted interventions. Future studies are also needed that consider physical exposure differences between homecare and nursing home settings and between permanent and temporary workers, preferably using direct measurements.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHumansHomecareNursing homePhysical workloadPhysiological demandsTemporary workers

Identifiers

PMID40926145
PMCPMC12948920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.