ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2025
Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Closantel Against Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Closantel Against Staphylococcus epidermidis.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis is recognized as the major cause of implanted indwelling medical device-related infections. The ability of S. epidermidis to form biofilms largely increases its resistance to conventional antibiotics, which is the major cause of treatment failure. Therefore, there is a pressing need to discover novel antimicrobials against S. epidermidis biofilms. In this study, Closantel (Clos), an antiparasitic drug, was repurposed to be effective against S. epidermidis planktonic cells with the minimal inhibitory concentration values of 0.25-0.5 μg/mL. Clos exhibited potent biofilm inhibition at ≥ 0.5 μg/mL and achieved effective eradication at ≥ 1 μg/mL. Notably, Clos induced lower resistance in S. epidermidis compared to Rifampicin. Mechanism study indicated that Clos exerted the bactericidal activity mainly through inducing bacterial cell membrane depolarization and further disruption. And the antibiofilm activity of Clos could be partially due to the inhibition of initial adhesion and extracellular polysaccharides production. In addition, CCK-8 assay showed that Clos at 16 μg/mL had limited cytotoxicity in A2780, HaCaT and 293 T cells. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that Clos, a molecule targeting bacterial cell membranes, exhibits strong antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects in vitro against S. epidermidis. Although, side effects were reported in mammals, developing Clos derivatives could be still an effective therapeutic strategy to treat S. epidermidis-related infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.