ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Genomic data sharing in research across Europe: legal challenges and upcoming opportunities within the European Health Data Space.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- PRISM-G: an interpretable privacy scoring framework for assessing risk in synthetic human genome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Towards responsible genome-wide screening: normative and stakeholder considerations.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Federated, governed, and interoperable? The emerging architecture of public human genomic data infrastructures: a European perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- The European Health Data Space and biobanking in Europe: synergies, tensions and the future governance of data-driven health research.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Sovereign AI supercomputers: a global landscape review of unprecedented biomedical research infrastructure.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Piloting an infrastructure for the secondary use of health data: learnings from the HealthData@EU Pilot.European journal of public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The European Health Data Space (EHDS) will help researchers use health data across EU Member States (MS). Currently, cross-border research faces heterogeneous data access processes. Using a real-world use case, this paper analyses challenges and opportunities brought by the upcoming implementation of the EHDS, assessing the situation before and after the regulation comes into force. The use case focused on metastatic colorectal cancer, analysing the relations between mutational signatures and clinical trajectories while addressing data access procedures across MS. The regulatory landscape and the challenges that need to be addressed for the EHDS to enable the secondary use of health data, particularly genomic data, are complex and heterogeneous across MS. We describe the pathway from data application to access to pseudonymized data in secure processing environments, emphasizing the legal requirements, including the role of ethics committees. Finally, we analyse the success factors for achieving access to the data and the reasons for access denial to support shaping the upcoming EHDS implementation. Several challenges remain unaddressed for cross-border data use, especially in the context of genomic data, where the complexity and heterogeneity of informed consent can impact or even impede data-sharing efforts. While EHDS can simplify processes across MS, it is crucial to ensure that additional safeguards do not negatively impact or block access to health data and that EHDS infrastructure is ready for effective and affordable processing of large volumes of genomic and other data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.