ReviewContact dermatitis2025
Moisturising Gloves as a Solution for Occupational Skin Health: Advances and Challenges.
Review in Contact dermatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moisturising Gloves as a Solution for Occupational Skin Health: Advances and Challenges.Contact dermatitis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extended glove usage is crucial in various occupational settings to safeguard workers and maintain hygiene standards. However, prolonged wear creates an occlusive environment that disrupts normal skin evaporation, leading to temporary overhydration. This reversal of the diffusion gradient facilitates the penetration of residual soaps and alcohol from hand hygiene practices, which can deplete skin moisture and cause irritation. Moisturising agents have been integrated into gloves to address occupational dry skin, as conventional lotions often suffer from low compliance and incompatibility with latex. Their selection requires careful optimisation to ensure effective skin penetration without compromising glove integrity or introducing manufacturing complexities. Additionally, variations in activation stimuli among individuals must be taken into account to ensure consistent efficacy. This review discusses advancements in moisturising glove technologies, including interlayer coatings, direct surface applications, matrix integration, microencapsulation and hydrogel-based controlled-release systems. Despite these innovations, research gaps remain in standardising hydration assessment methods, evaluating real-world performance and comparing the efficacy of moisturising gloves with conventional skincare methods. Addressing these challenges through further clinical studies is crucial for refining the design and effectiveness of moisturising gloves in occupational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.