ArticleNutrition bulletin2025
The Effect of Eating Rate of Ultra-Processed Foods on Dietary Intake, Eating Behaviour, Body Composition and Metabolic Responses-Rationale, Design and Outcomes of the Restructure Randomised Controlled Trial.
Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06113146 (Impact of the Eating Rate of Ultra-processed Foods on Dietary Intake Behavior and Metabolic Responses), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of the Eating Rate of Ultra-processed Foods on Dietary Intake Behavior and Metabolic Responses
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eating rate has sustained effects on energy intake from ultraprocessed diets: a 2-week ad libitum dietary randomized controlled crossover trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Prospective association between baseline ultra-processed food consumption and future adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines in children: findings from the SENDO project.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Separating Myths From Facts About Bread and Health.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Review
- The Future of Food Processing-A Food Science and Technology Perspective. Proceedings of a Roundtable Event.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Article
- Ultra-processed food exposure and health outcomes: Current evidence, controversies, and future perspectives.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extensive epidemiological research and the findings from one randomised controlled feeding trial (RCT) have shown associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and higher energy intakes. To date the specific properties of UPF foods and diets that may be responsible for driving higher energy intakes remain unclear. A comparison of the diets in the single RCT to date showed a significantly higher eating rate (g/min, ER) for meals in the UPF diet compared to those in the minimally processed diet. Numerous acute feeding trials have shown that foods with textures that promote a slower ER tend to be consumed in smaller portions compared to those consumed at a faster ER. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for the Restructure RCT with the primary aim to determine the effect of meal texture-derived ER (g/min) of UPF diets ('UPF Slow ER' vs. 'UPF Fast ER') on daily ad libitum energy intake (kcal/day) across a 14-day period. The secondary objectives of the Restructure RCT are to compare changes in body composition and metabolic markers following the same two diets. We hypothesise that texture-derived differences in ER will moderate food and energy intakes from UPF diets such that participants will consume less when they encounter textures that promote a slower eating rate. The outcomes of the Restructure RCT aim to provide new insights on the proposed mechanisms by which UPF are thought to promote greater energy intakes, and aid in the development of food-based strategies to moderate dietary energy intakes from processed foods. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06113146.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.