Evidence mapPaperPMID 40926558Full record

ArticleNutrition bulletin2025

The Effect of Eating Rate of Ultra-Processed Foods on Dietary Intake, Eating Behaviour, Body Composition and Metabolic Responses-Rationale, Design and Outcomes of the Restructure Randomised Controlled Trial.

Marlou P Lasschuijt, Lise A J Heuven, Marieke van Bruinessen, Zhen Liu, Josep Rubert, Markus Stieger, Kees de Graaf, Ciarán G Forde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06113146 (Impact of the Eating Rate of Ultra-processed Foods on Dietary Intake Behavior and Metabolic Responses), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06113146 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of the Eating Rate of Ultra-processed Foods on Dietary Intake Behavior and Metabolic Responses

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled41ConditionsEating RateArmsultra-processed slow eating rate diet, Ultra-processed fast eating rate diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marlou P LasschuijtDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Lise A J HeuvenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marieke van BruinessenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Zhen LiuDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Josep RubertDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-2334
Markus StiegerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Kees de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Ciarán G FordeDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4001-9182

Funding

Top Sector Agri and Food TKI 22.150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive epidemiological research and the findings from one randomised controlled feeding trial (RCT) have shown associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and higher energy intakes. To date the specific properties of UPF foods and diets that may be responsible for driving higher energy intakes remain unclear. A comparison of the diets in the single RCT to date showed a significantly higher eating rate (g/min, ER) for meals in the UPF diet compared to those in the minimally processed diet. Numerous acute feeding trials have shown that foods with textures that promote a slower ER tend to be consumed in smaller portions compared to those consumed at a faster ER. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for the Restructure RCT with the primary aim to determine the effect of meal texture-derived ER (g/min) of UPF diets ('UPF Slow ER' vs. 'UPF Fast ER') on daily ad libitum energy intake (kcal/day) across a 14-day period. The secondary objectives of the Restructure RCT are to compare changes in body composition and metabolic markers following the same two diets. We hypothesise that texture-derived differences in ER will moderate food and energy intakes from UPF diets such that participants will consume less when they encounter textures that promote a slower eating rate. The outcomes of the Restructure RCT aim to provide new insights on the proposed mechanisms by which UPF are thought to promote greater energy intakes, and aid in the development of food-based strategies to moderate dietary energy intakes from processed foods. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06113146.

Indexed as

Body CompositionDietEatingFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorAdultEnergy IntakeFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adultdietary energy intakeeating ratefood texturemetabolic healthNovaultra‐processed diet

Identifiers

PMID40926558
PMCPMC12621179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.