Evidence mapPaperPMID 40926760Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Changes to ACA Individual Insurance Markets After States Leave Healthcare.gov 2016-2023.

David M Anderson, Sukriti Beniwal, Salpy Kanimian

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M AndersonUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4524-2479
Sukriti BeniwalGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Salpy KanimianRice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate changes in enrollment, average risk scores, and premiums in the Affordable Care Act individual market after states transitioned from the federally facilitated marketplace (Healthcare.gov) to a state-based marketplace (SBM) between 2018 and 2023. This study employed a retrospective, quasi-experimental design of secondary data using a synthetic difference-in-differences analysis methodology. Our primary data source consisted of individual market risk adjustment summaries from 2016 to 2023. We conducted a synthetic difference-in-differences analysis to evaluate changes in enrolled member months, average premium paid, and state average risk scores in the individual health insurance market. Our treatment group comprised 4 states that transitioned from Healthcare.gov to a state-based marketplace between 2018 and 2023. The comparison group was the 33 states that continuously used Healthcare.gov from 2016 to 2023. States that converted from the FFM, Healthcare.gov, to a state-based marketplace did not experience statistically significant changes in enrollment, premiums paid, or state average risk scores. These results were robust to alternative specifications. The transition to state-based marketplaces in 4 states did not lead to significant changes in the ACA individual market risk pool enrollment, or premiums paid while potentially increasing state policy autonomy. Future policy efforts should explore how states can leverage policy autonomy to improve market outcomes and coverage.

Indexed as

Health Insurance ExchangesInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AdjustmentState GovernmentUnited StatesAffordable Care Actcooperative federalismhealth insurancehealth policyhealth reformstate policy

Identifiers

PMID40926760
PMCPMC12423536

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.