ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Blood flow restriction training: a new approach for preventing and treating sarcopenia in older adults.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of lower limb blood flow restriction training on post-activation potentiation enhancement and fatigue: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of a low-load multi-component training program with blood flow restriction versus the same program without blood flow restriction on muscle thickness and functional outcomes in physically inactive young adults: randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Trial
- Partial ischemia as molecular medicine: molecular mechanisms and clinical horizons of blood flow restriction training.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Research Progress of Sarcopenia Index in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the intensification of population aging, sarcopenia in older adults has become a significant public health issue affecting quality of life. Sarcopenia is a progressive and systemic skeletal muscle disorder characterized by reduced muscle mass, decreased muscle strength, and diminished physical function. Although conventional exercise interventions have shown some efficacy in managing sarcopenia, their effects are limited and often insufficient to effectively halt disease progression. Therefore, exploring more efficient exercise interventions is of great importance. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT), as an emerging exercise intervention, has garnered increasing attention in recent years for its application in sarcopenia among older adults. Studies suggest that, compared to traditional resistance exercise, BFRT demonstrates superior effectiveness in improving muscle strength and mass in older adults, potentially serving as a viable alternative to conventional training methods. However, BFRT also presents certain limitations, including potential risks such as cardiovascular responses and muscle injury. Therefore, careful consideration of appropriate application scenarios and exercise loads is crucial during its implementation. This study reviews the biological mechanisms of BFRT in the intervention of sarcopenia and proposes tailored training protocols and application models for older adults. Furthermore, it thoroughly examines the potential risks and applicability of BFRT, aiming to provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for clinical application. Additionally, the limitations of current research are analyzed, offering recommendations for future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.