ArticleNEJM AI2025
Video-Based Biomechanical Analysis Captures Disease-Specific Movement Signatures of Different Neuromuscular Diseases.
Article in NEJM AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validations and applications of markerless motion capture using OpenCap: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasound System on BI-RADS C4 Breast Lesions Based on Breast Density.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssessing human movement is essential for diagnosing and monitoring movement-related conditions like neuromuscular disorders. Timed function tests (TFTs) are among the most widespread types of assessments due to their speed and simplicity, but they cannot capture disease-specific movement patterns. Conversely, biomechanical analysis can produce sensitive disease-specific biomarkers, but it is traditionally confined to laboratory settings. Recent advances in smartphone video-based biomechanical analysis enable the quantification of three-dimensional movement with the ease and speed required for clinical settings. However, the potential of this technology to offer more sensitive assessments of human function than TFTs remains untested.
methodsTo compare video-based analysis with TFTs, we collected an observational dataset from 129 individuals: 28 with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, 58 with myotonic dystrophy, and 43 controls with no diagnosed neuromuscular condition. We used OpenCap, a free open-source software tool, to capture smartphone video-based biomechanics of nine different movements in a median time of 16 minutes per participant. From these recordings, we extracted 34 interpretable movement features. Using these features, we evaluated the ability of video-based biomechanics to reproduce four TFTs (10-meter walk, 10-meter run, timed up-and-go, and 5-times sit-to-stand) while capturing additional disease-specific signatures of movement.
resultsVideo-based biomechanical analysis reproduced all four TFTs (r>0.98) with similar test-retest reliability. In addition, video metrics outperformed TFTs at disease classification (P=0.021). Unlike TFTs, video-based biomechanical analysis identified disease-specific signatures of movement, such as differences in gait kinematics, that are not evident in TFTs.
conclusionsVideo-based biomechanical analysis can complement existing functional movement assessments by capturing more sensitive, disease-specific outcomes from human movement. This technology enables digital health solutions for assessing and monitoring motor function, complementing traditional clinical outcome measures to enhance care, management, and clinical trial design for movement-related conditions. (Funded by the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance and others.).
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.