Evidence mapPaperPMID 40926960Full record

ArticleNEJM AI2025

Video-Based Biomechanical Analysis Captures Disease-Specific Movement Signatures of Different Neuromuscular Diseases.

Parker S Ruth, Scott D Uhlrich, Constance de Monts, Antoine Falisse, Julie Muccini, Sydney Covitz, Shelby Vogt-Domke, John Day, Tina Duong, Scott L Delp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parker S RuthDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-4916
Scott D UhlrichDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-367X
Constance de MontsDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0009-0004-7659-8069
Antoine FalisseDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-0886
Julie MucciniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-4999
Sydney CovitzDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7430-4125
Shelby Vogt-DomkeDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0009-0000-0422-2848
John DayDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-9529
Tina DuongDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-4722
Scott L DelpDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9643-7551

Funding

Technology Training and DisseminationP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · 2022 to 2025
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing human movement is essential for diagnosing and monitoring movement-related conditions like neuromuscular disorders. Timed function tests (TFTs) are among the most widespread types of assessments due to their speed and simplicity, but they cannot capture disease-specific movement patterns. Conversely, biomechanical analysis can produce sensitive disease-specific biomarkers, but it is traditionally confined to laboratory settings. Recent advances in smartphone video-based biomechanical analysis enable the quantification of three-dimensional movement with the ease and speed required for clinical settings. However, the potential of this technology to offer more sensitive assessments of human function than TFTs remains untested.

methodsTo compare video-based analysis with TFTs, we collected an observational dataset from 129 individuals: 28 with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, 58 with myotonic dystrophy, and 43 controls with no diagnosed neuromuscular condition. We used OpenCap, a free open-source software tool, to capture smartphone video-based biomechanics of nine different movements in a median time of 16 minutes per participant. From these recordings, we extracted 34 interpretable movement features. Using these features, we evaluated the ability of video-based biomechanics to reproduce four TFTs (10-meter walk, 10-meter run, timed up-and-go, and 5-times sit-to-stand) while capturing additional disease-specific signatures of movement.

resultsVideo-based biomechanical analysis reproduced all four TFTs (r>0.98) with similar test-retest reliability. In addition, video metrics outperformed TFTs at disease classification (P=0.021). Unlike TFTs, video-based biomechanical analysis identified disease-specific signatures of movement, such as differences in gait kinematics, that are not evident in TFTs.

conclusionsVideo-based biomechanical analysis can complement existing functional movement assessments by capturing more sensitive, disease-specific outcomes from human movement. This technology enables digital health solutions for assessing and monitoring motor function, complementing traditional clinical outcome measures to enhance care, management, and clinical trial design for movement-related conditions. (Funded by the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance and others.).

Identifiers

PMID40926960
PMCPMC12416922

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.