ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Risk prediction of mechanical complications in acute myocardial infarction patients with prior malignancy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with prior malignancy have been largely understudied, despite potentially facing higher risks of adverse outcomes. This case-control study aimed to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mechanical complications among AMI patients with prior malignancies. Methods: This study enrolled AMI patients with prior malignancy who were hospitalized for treatment. Patients were divided into complication and control groups based on the occurrence of in-hospital mechanical complications. The mechanical complications in this study were defined as papillary muscle rupture (with or without acute mitral regurgitation), ventricular septal defect, large pericardial effusion, left ventricular pseudoaneurysm, and free wall rupture. Relaxed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to evaluate factors. A predictive nomogram was developed based on risk factors and evaluated through internal validation using Bootstrap method with Brier score. Results: A total of 127 AMI patients with prior malignancy were included, among whom 26 (20.5) were divided in the complication group. The in-hospital mortality was higher in the complication group compared to the control group [2 (7.7%) vs. 0 (0.0%), P = 0.041]. Following baseline analysis, LASSO logistic regression identified six independent risk factors, ranked by SHAP values as follows: body mass index, D-dimer, pulmonary hypertension, wall motion abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmia, and statin use. The nomogram, constructed by these factors, demonstrated good predictive performance, with a Brier score of 0.116 in the internal validation. Conclusion: This study highlights key clinical predictors for mechanical complications in AMI patients with prior malignancy. The long-term usage of statins might benefit this specific patient population even after the onset of AMI. The proposed nomogram offers a practical tool for early risk assessment and may support improved clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.