Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927136›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025

Retinal progenitor cells (jCell) for retinitis pigmentosa.

Jing Yang, Baruch D Kuppermann, David Liao, Mitul C Mehta, Chinhui Hsiang, Steven Menges, David S Boyer, Henry Klassen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02320812 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of the Safety and Tolerability of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02320812 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of the Safety and Tolerability of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells (jCell) in Adult Subjects With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorjCyte, IncRan2015 to 2017Enrolled28ConditionsRetinitis Pigmentosa (RP)Armshuman retinal progenitor cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing YangStem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Baruch D KuppermannGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
David LiaoRetina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Mitul C MehtaGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Chinhui HsiangStem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Steven MengesStem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
David S BoyerRetina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Henry KlassenStem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUM1TR004927 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DAN M COOPER, Eric J. Vilain · 2024 to 2026
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of intravitreal injection of human retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) at multiple dose levels in adults with non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Design: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase I/IIa safety study of RPCs in adults with RP ( Subjects: Adults ( Methods: Subjects, who were not selected for genotype, were divided across the two vision cohorts with each receiving a single intravitreal injection of one of: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 × 10 Results: Intravitreal RPC injection was well tolerated and associated with mostly transient mild to moderate adverse events. There were no signs of graft rejection. While primarily a safety study, exploratory efficacy assessments suggested improved BCVA measurements at all doses, with a possible dose-response at the highest levels. Mean BCVA change from pre-treatment to Month 12 in the treated vs untreated eyes was 1.4 letters for the 0.5 × 10 Conclusion: A single intravitreal injection of RPCs was well tolerated in this safety study. The exploratory efficacy data suggest potential improvement of BCVA in some RP patients, particularly at the highest dose. While viewed cautiously, the possible treatment effect should be further investigated in larger controlled studies. The RPC technology has received FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy designation. Later phase studies are ongoing. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02320812, NCT02320812.

Indexed as

allogeneic transplantationblindnesscell therapyintravitrealphotoreceptor dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID40927136
PMCPMC12414927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.