ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025
Retinal progenitor cells (jCell) for retinitis pigmentosa.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02320812 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of the Safety and Tolerability of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of the Safety and Tolerability of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells (jCell) in Adult Subjects With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restorative and regenerative therapies for vision loss.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- Stem cell-based therapies for neuroretinal degeneration: current landscape and future perspectives.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Review
- Update on the Management of ABCA4 Retinopathy (Stargardt Disease).Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Intravitreal Transplantation of Retinal Progenitor Cells Improves Outcome Measures in a Rat Model of Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of intravitreal injection of human retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) at multiple dose levels in adults with non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Design: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase I/IIa safety study of RPCs in adults with RP ( Subjects: Adults ( Methods: Subjects, who were not selected for genotype, were divided across the two vision cohorts with each receiving a single intravitreal injection of one of: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 × 10 Results: Intravitreal RPC injection was well tolerated and associated with mostly transient mild to moderate adverse events. There were no signs of graft rejection. While primarily a safety study, exploratory efficacy assessments suggested improved BCVA measurements at all doses, with a possible dose-response at the highest levels. Mean BCVA change from pre-treatment to Month 12 in the treated vs untreated eyes was 1.4 letters for the 0.5 × 10 Conclusion: A single intravitreal injection of RPCs was well tolerated in this safety study. The exploratory efficacy data suggest potential improvement of BCVA in some RP patients, particularly at the highest dose. While viewed cautiously, the possible treatment effect should be further investigated in larger controlled studies. The RPC technology has received FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy designation. Later phase studies are ongoing. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02320812, NCT02320812.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.