ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
The q-Dixon sequence for MRI predicts osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the severity of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using q-Dixon magnetic resonance imaging.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate whether q-Dixon sequence-based fat fraction (FF) values of the lumbar spine can predict osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) risk in older adult(s) osteoporosis patients. Materials & methods: Thirty OVCF patients and 15 osteoporosis patients were enrolled. Areas of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn using the post-processing workstation, and FF values of the patient's L1-L4 vertebrae (except the fractured vertebrae) were measured. The Pearson correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between the average lumbar spine FF value and bone mineral density (BMD). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of the FF values and to determine the best cut-off value for prediction. Results: The average lumbar spine FF value and the FF values of the L1-L4 vertebrae in the fracture group were significantly higher than those in the non-fracture group, and there was no significant difference in BMD between the two groups. ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the average lumbar spine FF value was 0.822, with sensitivity = 73.3%, specificity = 86.7%, and cut-off value = 57.27%. Among the L1-L4 vertebrae, the FF value of L2 vertebrae had the highest AUC of 0.870, and the cutoff value was 56.62%. Conclusion: The FF values of the lumbar spine measured by the q-Dixon sequence can help predict OVCF risk and provide complementary information to BMD measurements. The FF value of L2 vertebrae has the best prediction efficiency. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the relatively small sample size (n=45) and manual ROI segmentation method used in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.