ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Systematic Review of Continuity of Care Strategies for Enhancing Diabetes Self-Management in Older Adults in Asian Countries.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategic development of integrated governance for type 2 diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) care in Indonesia: a mixed-methods approach.Global health action · 2026Article
- Systematic review of cardiovascular care delivery across health systems in the Asia-Pacific: a regional roadmap for strengthening cardiovascular care.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Gamification-Based Interventions in Chronic Disease Care: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major health challenge among older adults in Asia. Challenges include limited healthcare access and poor self-care adherence. Continuity of care has emerged as a key strategy to enhance diabetes self-management in this population. Purpose: This review aimed to identify the continuity of care strategies in improving diabetes self-management among older adults in Asian countries. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251017515). A comprehensive search was performed in five major databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Taylor & Francis. Inclusion criteria covered full-text, english-language experimental studies in Asian countries. Studies were excluded due to lack of full-text access, non-English language, and secondary research. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive qualitative and thematic analysis. Results: A total of 12 included studies were analyzed in this review. Three categories of continuity of care strategies were identified such as social support and educational interventions, community-based interventions and integrated health management, and technology-based interventions and health monitoring. Most of the studies analyzed in this review indicate that continuity of care improves medication adherence, self-efficacy, physical activity, glycemic control, patient satisfaction, and quality of life among older adults with diabetes. For instance, several interventions reported reductions in HbA1c ranging from 0.28% to 0.7%, indicating meaningful clinical improvements in glycemic control among older adults. Conclusion: Continuity of care is an effective strategy for enhancing diabetes self-management among older adults, with a combination of educational, technological, and community-based interventions yielding optimal outcomes. Integrating technology into diabetes monitoring can improve medication adherence, while social support programs and community health services play a vital role in enhancing patients' overall well-being. This study highlights the need for tailoring continuity of care strategies to the social and cultural contexts of Asian countries to maximize long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.