Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927869›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Neuroimaging Data Informed Mood and Psychosis Diagnosis Using an Ensemble Deep Multimodal Framework.

Hooman Rokham, Haleh Falakshahi, Godfrey D Pearlson, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hooman RokhamTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2650-0156
Haleh FalakshahiTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Vince D CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Data-driven solutions for temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal dynamic functional connectivityR01MH123610 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
National Institute of Health R01EB006841National Science Foundation 2112455NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R01MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123610NIMH NIH HHS R01MH123610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating neuroimaging data to identify brain-based markers of mental illnesses has gained significant attention. Nevertheless, these endeavors encounter challenges arising from a reliance on symptoms and self-report assessments in making an initial diagnosis. The absence of biological data to delineate nosological categories hinders the provision of additional neurobiological insights into these disorders. This study explores the use of neuroimaging to identify brain-based markers for mental illnesses, addressing the limitations of existing diagnoses. Previous research showed the potential of integrating structural neuroimaging data by treating diagnostic categories as uncertain and adjusting them to align better with biological data. Building on this, our current research incorporates multimodal neuroimaging data, combining fMRI with structural MRI, and introduces methodological advances to enhance diagnosis by creating more homogeneous categories based on MRI-derived neurobiological information. Unlike other studies that reclassify psychiatric groups purely based on biological data, our approach integrates neuroimaging and symptom-based categories using ensemble methods, deep learning, and data fusion. This strategy aims to improve symptom-based categorization by identifying biologically-based categories that help distinguish between correctly classified, challenging, and noisy samples. Our goals include identifying potential biomarkers for existing symptom-based categories, determining biologically homogeneous groups, and mitigating label noise across mood and psychosis categories. We analyzed the relationship between biological findings and existing categories, highlighting discrepancies between brain imaging features and symptom-based categories, and assessing the potential of augmenting label categories for sample heterogeneity. Notably, visualization techniques provided insights into distinct brain patterns in well-classified versus challenging samples. We used a deep convolutional framework and bagging approaches for diagnostic classification, finding that ensemble deep models outperformed individual models, and multimodal frameworks consistently surpassed unimodal approaches. In sum, this work highlights the potential of combining existing symptom-based categorization with multimodal data and advanced data-driven approaches to improve the categorization of mental illness.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbaggingensemble deep learninglabel noisemultimodalneuroimagingpsychosis

Identifiers

PMID40927869
PMCPMC12421244

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.