ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Neuroimaging Data Informed Mood and Psychosis Diagnosis Using an Ensemble Deep Multimodal Framework.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal classification of mood disorders using structural MRI and polygenic risk scores: a machine learning ablation study in UK Biobank.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging Data Informed Mood and Psychosis Diagnosis Using an Ensemble Deep Multimodal Framework.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Investigating neuroimaging data to identify brain-based markers of mental illnesses has gained significant attention. Nevertheless, these endeavors encounter challenges arising from a reliance on symptoms and self-report assessments in making an initial diagnosis. The absence of biological data to delineate nosological categories hinders the provision of additional neurobiological insights into these disorders. This study explores the use of neuroimaging to identify brain-based markers for mental illnesses, addressing the limitations of existing diagnoses. Previous research showed the potential of integrating structural neuroimaging data by treating diagnostic categories as uncertain and adjusting them to align better with biological data. Building on this, our current research incorporates multimodal neuroimaging data, combining fMRI with structural MRI, and introduces methodological advances to enhance diagnosis by creating more homogeneous categories based on MRI-derived neurobiological information. Unlike other studies that reclassify psychiatric groups purely based on biological data, our approach integrates neuroimaging and symptom-based categories using ensemble methods, deep learning, and data fusion. This strategy aims to improve symptom-based categorization by identifying biologically-based categories that help distinguish between correctly classified, challenging, and noisy samples. Our goals include identifying potential biomarkers for existing symptom-based categories, determining biologically homogeneous groups, and mitigating label noise across mood and psychosis categories. We analyzed the relationship between biological findings and existing categories, highlighting discrepancies between brain imaging features and symptom-based categories, and assessing the potential of augmenting label categories for sample heterogeneity. Notably, visualization techniques provided insights into distinct brain patterns in well-classified versus challenging samples. We used a deep convolutional framework and bagging approaches for diagnostic classification, finding that ensemble deep models outperformed individual models, and multimodal frameworks consistently surpassed unimodal approaches. In sum, this work highlights the potential of combining existing symptom-based categorization with multimodal data and advanced data-driven approaches to improve the categorization of mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.