ReviewCancer medicine2025
A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening for endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer in premenopausal women withBMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent advances in machine learning-enhanced extracellular vesicle omics for oncology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics biomarkers in female fertility: from oocyte quality to endometrial receptivity and clinical translation.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Genetically predicted inflammatory cytokines mediate the associations between the gut microbiota and ovarian cancer: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer: advancing in precision diagnosis and clinical management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A cross-validated deep learning framework for automated detection of DMBA-induced ovarian cancer from histopathological images with CA-125 biomarker support.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- From Inflammation to Malignancy: The Link Between Endometriosis and Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advances in the use of exosomes for the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Immunohistochemical predictors of local recurrence in breast carcinoma: development and sensitivity validation of an IHC-based risk score.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Predicting cancer treatment outcomes using machine learning enabled clinical decision support systems.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOvarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.
methodsWe analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.
findingsBiomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.
conclusionBiomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.