Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927964›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2025

A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.

Somayyeh Hormaty, Anwar Nather Seiwan, Bushra H Rasheed, Hanieh Parvaz, Ali Gharahzadeh, Hamid Ghaznavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Immunohistochemical predictors of local recurrence in breast carcinoma: development and sensitivity validation of an IHC-based risk score.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Somayyeh HormatyStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Department, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anwar Nather SeiwanDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Basrah University, Basrah, Iraq.
Bushra H RasheedCollege of Education Ibn Al-Haytham, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Hanieh ParvazDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ali GharahzadehDepartment of Operating Room, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Iran.
Hamid GhaznaviDepartment of Computer Engineering, Social and Biological Network Analysis Laboratory, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7118-8309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.

methodsWe analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.

findingsBiomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.

conclusionBiomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerMachine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsCA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 Antigenearly detectionmachine learningovarian cancerprecision medicineprognosis biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40927964
PMCPMC12421415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.