ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Quantification of Normative Human Choriocapillaris Measures Across the Macula.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess macular choriocapillaris (CC) metrics in healthy volunteers (HVs) without ocular disease and demonstrate CC variations in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) using adaptive optics optical coherence tomography angiography (AO-OCTA). Methods: Twenty-one HVs and three IRD patients were imaged. Macular variation in 20 HVs in CC metrics (CC density, CC diameter, CC tortuosity, void diameter, void area, lobule count, lobule area, and RPE-CC distance) were assessed by imaging a 28° strip of overlapping AO-OCTA volumes (3° × 3°) from the optic nerve head to the temporal macula. En face projections of the CC at 1° intervals across the strip were created and metrics extracted using custom software. Results: CC density was mostly invariant across the macula at 0.523 ± 0.006, although it was slightly higher in the foveal region. The CC diameter decreased monotonically from 15.9 ± 0.7 µm in the nasal macula (-12°) to 14.2 ± 1.1 µm in the temporal macula (12°). Void measures also decreased from the nasal to the temporal macula: from 16.2 ± 1.4 µm to 14.6 ± 1.2 µm for void diameter and from 1418 ± 436 µm2 to 1243 ± 364 µm2 for void area. Lobule count peaked in the central macula. RPE-CC distance peaked at the fovea (fovea, 16.8 µm; periphery, ∼13-14 µm). CC tortuosity (1.17 ± 0.01) was constant across the macula. We observed a correlation with age in CC density, void diameter, and void area. AO-OCTA detected subclinical flow dropout in drusen regions. CC changes were observed in IRD patients with characteristics specific to the disease. Conclusions: Normative AO-OCTA-based CC metrics can provide insight into ocular disease pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.