ArticlePloS one2025
Relationship between the blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with ischemic stroke.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of Modified NIHSS and APUA Scores in Predicting in-Hospital Mortality and Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
- Survival and predictors of mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes at a teaching hospital in Ghana: a retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated with ischemic stroke is a major challenge to global public health and is related to poor prognosis. However, the role of blood urea nitrogen(BUN)to serum albumin ratio (BAR) in predicting in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke has not been fully explored. This study was carried out to investigate the relationship between BAR level and in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke.
methodsThe MIMIC-IV database was searched for data on T2DM patients with ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The BAR was calculated as follows: BUN (mg/dl)/ serum albumin (g/dl). Logistic regression was employed to investigate the relationship between BAR and in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) was leveraged to examine the dose-response relationship of BAR with the outcome. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to measure the ability of BAR to predict the outcome. In addition, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to explore the value of BAR in clinical practice. The consistency and robustness of the research results were assessed by subgroup analysis and the presence of interactions using a likelihood ratio test.
resultsFinally, 1136 patients were included for evaluation in this study. As BAR levels increased, the in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke also increased (OR:1.06; 95% CI:1.01-1.11; P < 0.01). The RCS analysis suggested that there was a linear relationship between BAR and in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke (p = 0.276). The ROC curve indicated that BAR was superior to BUN, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting the in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke. The DCA curve indicated that the net benefit of BAR was better than BUN, SOFA, and GCS. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no interaction between BAR and each subgroup (all p-value > 0.05).
conclusionThe in-hospital mortality of T2DM patients with ischemic stroke increased with elevated BAR levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.