ArticlePloS one2025
Time-restricted feeding leads to sex- and organ-specific responses in the murine digestive system.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-restricted feeding rescues sociability deficits and reduces neuroinflammation in aged mice.Neurobiology of aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food intake is a key regulator of the digestive system function; however, little is known about organ- and sex-specific differences in food-driven regulation. We placed male and female C57Bl/6 mice on time-restricted feeding (TRF), limiting access to food to an 8-hour window. Food was added either at dark (ZT12) or light (ZT0) onset for 14 days. Afterwards, the feeding period was delayed by 4 hours for half the mice, and the respective TRF regime continued for another 14 days. TRF from ZT12 to ZT20 led to the highest weight gain in females and the lowest in males, while improving intestinal transepithelial resistance (TEER) in both sexes. However, it also diminished food-anticipatory gene expression of several hepatic genes, particularly in female mice. Shifting food access to ZT16 increased weight gain and reduced fasting glucose levels in male mice, while also inducing strong food-driven gene expression changes in hepatic and duodenal tissues in both sexes. Feeding during the early lights-on phase (ZT0-ZT8) caused only minor physiological changes. However, it led to an overall downregulation of hepatic and an upregulation of duodenal and gastric gene expression and blunted the food-anticipatory expression response in both sexes. Delaying feeding until ZT4 was highly detrimental, reducing TEER and further disrupting gene expression in the stomach and liver in both sexes. In contrast, at least partial restoration of food-driven gene expression was seen in the duodenum, particularly in males. These findings highlight the strong sex- and organ-specific effects of food intake time on physiological and gene expression responses. Notably, we observed a lack of alignment in gene-expression responses between the gut and liver, underscoring tissue-specific sensitivity to feeding cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.