ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
eHealth Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality of Evidence in Remote Monitoring of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a morbid condition associated with frequent hospitalization and high mortality. Effective self-management is essential for patients with LC to monitor fluctuating symptoms and follow complex treatment regimens. However, strategies are often unsustainable and insufficiently tailored to individuals with cognitive impairments. Although eHealth interventions enable continuous monitoring, personalized guidance, and improved accessibility in other chronic conditions, comprehensive evidence for eHealth self-management interventions specifically tailored to patients with LC remains limited. Objective: This scoping review systematically identified and described existing eHealth self-management interventions for patients with LC, analyzed their core components, and summarized the reported outcome variables. Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies published between 2013 and June 2025. Interventional studies targeting adults with LC and involving eHealth-based self-management were included. Data on study design, intervention components, delivery methods, and outcome domains were extracted. The results were synthesized descriptively using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, and reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Results: Among 19,695 records screened, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 quasi-experimental studies, 1 pilot test, 2 feasibility studies, 2 usability studies, and 1 cost-effectiveness study. The 8 intervention studies utilized smartphone apps or telephone and incorporated 6 key components: symptom monitoring (100% of the included studies), lifestyle behavior modification (n=5, 63%), information provision (n=5, 63%), alert-triggered responses (n=3, 38%), counseling and motivation (n=2, 25%), and reminders (n=2, 25%). The intervention durations ranged from 1 to 6 months. Among all 9 studies, outcomes were assessed across 5 domains: physical (n=3, 33%), psychosocial (n=2, 22%), clinical (n=4, 44%), self-management (n=3, 33%), and implementation (n=6, 67%). Some studies reported improvements in hospital admissions (n=4, 44%), muscle mass (n=1, 11%), self-management knowledge (n=1, 11%), and cost outcomes (n=1, 11%). Conclusions: This review identified diverse eHealth self-management interventions with core components for patients with LC, evaluated across multiple outcome domains. Nonetheless, the evidence remains limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous study designs and outcome measures. Future research should prioritize rigorous randomized trials, standardized intervention frameworks, and core outcome sets to support clinical implementation and effectiveness evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.