ReviewBiological psychiatry2026
Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HARMONY: A large-scale harmonized neuroimaging dataset for research on anxious misery disorders.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Small Lesions, Distributed Effects: Interpreting Neuroimaging After Focused Ultrasound Capsulotomy.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment, akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission in response to initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of 7 years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method, a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across 6 large-scale biotype circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their personalized circuit scores, has the potential to double remission rates compared with unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.