ArticleNature2025
Late fluid flow in a primitive asteroid revealed by Lu-Hf isotopes in Ryugu.
Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing the aqueous environment of the Ryugu parent body through the speciation of multiple elements.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ryugu and Bennu preserve primordial isotopic heterogeneity absent from the meteorite record.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Accretion of volatile elements on Earth without the need of a late veneer.Science advances · 2026Article
- Hydrothermal alteration of Ryugu from a disruptive impact recorded in a returned sample.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
87 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbonaceous asteroids are the source of the most primitive meteorites
Identifiers
40931075What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.