ReviewDiabetes care2026
Beyond Glucose-Rethinking Prediabetes for Precision Prevention.
Review in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staging intermediate hyperglycaemia for type 2 diabetes prevention: the ELSA-Brasil study.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Type 2 diabetes subtypes for precision medicine: methodological challenges and alternative prediction-based approaches.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Response to Comment on Wagner et al. Beyond Glucose-Rethinking Prediabetes for Precision Prevention.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Merging T1D and T2D Management: Shared Strategies for Common Goals-Building on Early Lessons From GLP-1 Trials in T1D.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Cohort profile: The DIabetes and ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DISTEMI) Study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- The Natural History of Prediabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in the Pediatric Population.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Heterogeneity in risk and potential pathogenic associations of NAFLD among distinct prediabetic phenotypes in young and middle-aged adults.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Metabolic characteristics and factors associated with prediabetes in Chinese adults based on real-world health examination data: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Impact of skeletal muscle mass index on glycemic progression and remission in Chinese adults with prediabetes: a nationwide cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediabetes affects more than one-third of U.S. adults, yet represents a biologically heterogeneous state that is only partly captured by traditional glycemic categories (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or borderline elevated HbA1c). Leveraging unsupervised clustering in comprehensively phenotyped cohorts has identified six reproducible prediabetes subtypes integrating insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, visceral and hepatic fat, and genetic risk. Three high-risk subtypes (progressing prediabetes with fatty liver, progressing prediabetes with β-cell failure, and slow progressors with hyperinsulinemic insulin resistance) show distinct trajectories toward diabetes and unique complication patterns. For example, "slow progressors" develop albuminuria and face excess mortality, despite only modest glycemic deterioration over 10-15 years, showing that complications can arise before diabetes diagnosis. Recognizing these subtypes sharpens risk stratification and opens a path toward precision prevention. Intensive lifestyle modification and bariatric surgery offer the greatest glycemic benefit in the fatty liver subtype, whereas early pharmacologic β-cell protection may be required for the β-cell failure cluster. GLP-1-based therapies offer promising subtype-specific options and should be tested in randomized controlled studies. Future prediabetes intervention trials should move beyond diabetes incidence as the sole end point and systematically evaluate kidney, nerve, eye, and cardiovascular outcomes. While testing for long-term clinical end points might not be feasible in studies where individuals with prediabetes are recruited, the use of surrogate end points could facilitate the assessment of early complications. Such complication-focused, subtype-guided studies will determine whether early, tailored therapy can halt tissue damage and reduce the public health burden linked to prediabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.