ArticleEpilepsia open2025
Clinical utility of an ambulatory absence seizure detection system.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Holistic management of epilepsy in adults with intellectual development disorders.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical utility of an ambulatory absence seizure detection system.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel absence seizure detection systems have emerged in recent years, showing consistent results in ambulatory monitoring. This study aimed to provide real-world evidence of how these systems support clinical decision-making. At the Freiburg Epilepsy Center, 16 patients diagnosed with genetic generalized epilepsy were provided with a human-driven, AI-assisted electrographic absence seizure detection service utilizing a wearable EEG device during a three-day ambulatory monitoring period. We retrospectively analyzed and categorized therapeutic decisions made by neurologists based on their interpretation of the service's results in the context of routine clinical care. Electrographic seizure frequency and mean seizure duration were compared based on whether an intervention in treatment or care management was performed. Additionally, we assessed patients' self-reporting performance and compared agreement between seizure activity reported by patients and that recorded by the service. Electrographic absence seizure patterns were observed in 12 patients, with a total of 459 events recorded. Agreement with seizure diary data was low (Cohen's κ = 0.14). The data obtained influenced neurologists' decisions on confirming therapeutic success, adjusting treatment plans, recommending inpatient video-EEG monitoring, and performing differential diagnostic evaluations. Patients with an intervention exhibited higher electrographic seizure frequencies and longer mean seizure durations. The results underscore the technology's potential in supporting clinical decisions by enhancing the clinical picture. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We used a wearable EEG device to quantify absence seizures in people with epilepsy during everyday activities. The system helped neurologists to identify and assess seizure activity objectively. Our findings show that this can support treatment decisions, highlighting the potential to improve clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.