ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Current Evidence-Based Treatment of Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).
Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A sex-specific perspective on coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: from vascular to myocardial disease.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Coronary Sinus Reduction for REDUCER-I Patients With Refractory Angina and Angiographically Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Bridging the Diagnosis-Treatment Divide in Women with INOCA-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the techniques for coronary function testing (CFT) were largely developed more than 30 years ago, consensus on the specific diagnostic criteria and endotypes is still lacking. Furthermore, the management of patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is challenging for most cardiologists. These patients are often a burden to the health care system due to recurrent presentations to the emergency room, repeated coronary angiography, and lack of improvement in their anginal symptoms even after being properly diagnosed with CFT. Therapies for coronary microvascular dysfunction, coronary vasospasm, and myocardial bridging have been tested in small trials and only a few randomized controlled trials. However, we are still limited in the options of therapies that we can offer to our patients. Although techniques and principles of CFT have advanced significantly, the art of managing patients with ANOCA is very challenging. A dedicated comprehensive summary of all contemporary treatment options for ANOCA is needed to guide clinicians in managing this challenging population of patients. This article subdivides ANOCA into 3 major categories: coronary microvascular dysfunction, coronary vasospasm, and myocardial bridging. Patients with ANOCA may present with 1 or a combination of the described categories. We describe major pillars in managing ANOCA patients: risk factors and lifestyle changes, traditional pharmacotherapy, device therapies, and novel approaches. We offer a summary of most evidence-based trials and scientific data on therapies for patients with ANOCA. This summary of available data about therapies aims to improve practitioners' knowledge and give more scientific merit to the care of patients with ANOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.