ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Diagnostic algorithm for clozapine-induced myocarditis: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClozapine, the gold standard for resistant schizophrenia, is underused due to risks like clozapine-induced myocarditis (CIM). Non-specific biomarkers and inconsistent imaging, and the significant overlap with clozapine-induced pneumonia (CIP) lead to misdiagnosis and premature discontinuation.
aimTo develop a diagnostic algorithm for CIM to enhance accuracy, differentiate from CIP, and guide safe clozapine rechallenge.
methodsA systematic review of 119 PubMed studies (published between 1990 and April 2025) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The review analyzed CIM diagnosis and rechallenge outcomes, with a focus on biomarkers, imaging, and collaboration with cardiology.
resultsCIM diagnosis relies on troponin and C-reactive protein; electrocardiography and echocardiography are inconsistently applied, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is underused. Rechallenge was successful in 64.7% to 68.9% of 136 cases, with 2.9% resulting in fatal outcomes. Up to 65% of presumed CIM cases lack confirmation. A proposed protocol integrates chest computed tomography to exclude pneumonia and CMR for CIM confirmation, with echocardiography as an alternative.
conclusionA protocol involving multidisciplinary collaboration among computed tomography, CMR, and cardiology improves CIM diagnosis. Slow titration prevents CIM; adjust the dose for CIP and discontinue for confirmed CIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.