ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Effects of technology-enhanced physical activity on brain and mental health in youth: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity (PA) is a key contributor to the neurocognitive and psychological development of children and adolescents. With the rapid integration of digital technologies in educational and recreational contexts, technology-enhanced PA (TEPA) interventions have emerged as promising tools for promoting mental and cognitive health. However, the effectiveness of various TEPA modalities-such as virtual reality (VR), mobile applications, and biofeedback systems-remains unclear. Prior findings are fragmented across systematic reviews with inconsistent methodologies. This umbrella review was conducted to synthesize current evidence and evaluate whether specific TEPA modalities yield differential benefits. We hypothesized that TEPA interventions with immersive and self-regulatory features provide greater enhancements in executive function (EF), cognitive function (CF), and mental health (MH) than passive or minimally interactive formats.
aimTo determine the effects of TEPA interventions and modality-specific characteristics on EF, CF, and MH outcomes in children and adolescents.
methodsAn umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Library) were searched up to March 2025. Eligible reviews included participants aged ≤ 18 years, assessed TEPA interventions, and reported EF, CF, or MH outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Data synthesis was stratified by intervention modality, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the
resultsA total of 11 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. Interventions using VR (2/2), game-based formats (2/2), biofeedback (2/2), and multicomponent programs (1/1) showed consistent evidence of improvements in EF and MH (
conclusionTEPA significantly improves MH and selectively enhances executive and CF in youth. Immersive, interactive, and biofeedback-driven modalities are particularly effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.