Evidence mapPaperPMID 40933225Full record

ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2025

Extending follow-up visits in people with HIV (PWH) receiving bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) therapy: an expert opinion.

Giovanni Di Perri, Stefano Bonora

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giovanni Di PerriDept of Medical Sciences, University of Torino Medical School, Torino, Italy.
Stefano BonoraDept of Medical Sciences, University of Torino Medical School, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our confidence on the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy has steadily increased in the last decade thanks to the continuous improvement of drugs, strategies and the ability to cope with the increase in life expectancy of people with HIV (PWH). Nevertheless antiretroviral therapy keeps on being a lifelong commitment and the current clinical research on anti-HIV treatment also points on the possibility to mitigate a series of remaining difficulties like patients' adherence, stigma and the logistic burden associated to periodical monitoring and drug refills. The newly developed long-acting injectables drugs made it possible to reduce the frequency of administration and improved adherence, but at present the recipients of these new solutions are asked to join the outpatient HIV services at least every two months to receive their injections and undergo immunovirological monitoring. This also because these newly developed options consist of two (2DR) instead of three drugs and such close monitoring might be necessary due to the lesser genetic barrier and forgiveness. The patients who instead are under stable oral antiretroviral therapy with persistent virologic suppression may benefit from extension of the time between consecutive controls. This particularly applies when 2

Indexed as

Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alfenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF)Dolutegravir (DTG)HIV-DNAHIV-RNAImmunovirological monitoringLong-Acting InjectablesPatients Living with HIV (PLHIV)Three-drug regimens (3DR)Two-drug regimens (2DR)

Identifiers

PMID40933225
PMCPMC12419169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.